Preprint / Version 1

Knowledge production with generative AI: ethical and authorship issues

##article.authors##

  • Cleyton Williams Golveia da Silva Brandao Federal University of Bahia image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-0359
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Telma Brito Rocha Federal University of Bahia image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8389-4542
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.16603

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, knowledge production, ethics, authorship

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the production of knowledge through the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), based on ethical and authorship reflections that emerge from this new technological scenario. Initially, it presents a brief historical contextualization of knowledge production, both globally and in Brazil, highlighting its transformations up to the consolidation of scientific research in the country. It then addresses the rise of generative AIs in the 21st century and their implications for text creation, emphasizing challenges related to transparency, responsibility, and academic integrity. The research adopts a qualitative, bibliographic approach. A literature review was conducted in the CAPES Journal Portal using specific descriptors related to generative AI, knowledge production, ethics, co-authorship, and standardization, resulting in the selection of nineteen works published between 2019 and 2025. Institutional documents from three Brazilian universities and SciELO Brazil were also analyzed, in addition to APA guidelines regarding the use of AI. It is concluded that generative artificial intelligences inaugurate the era of hybrid authorship and may be understood as co-authors or partners in the writing process. However, this categorization remains an open debate, surrounded by legal complexities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cleyton Williams Golveia da Silva Brandao, Federal University of Bahia

PhD candidate in Education at the Graduate Program in Education, Faculty of Education, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Holds a Master’s degree in Education (PGEDU/FACED/UFBA), with a research exchange period at the Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of Sumbe (ISCED-Sumbe), Angola. Specialist in Media Production for Online Education (SEAD/UFBA). Holds a degree in Pedagogy (FACED/UFBA). Substitute Professor of Pedagogy Internships (FACED/UFBA). Pedagogical Coordinator for the Bahia State Education Network.

Telma Brito Rocha, Federal University of Bahia

Telma Brito Rocha is an Assistant Professor at the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), having joined the institution in 2016. She teaches in both the undergraduate and graduate programs (PPGE) at the Faculty of Education. She holds a teaching degree in Pedagogy (2002), a Master's degree in Education (2005), and a Doctorate in Education (2010), all from UFBA. She leads the Intercultural Didactics and Technologies Research Group (Didatec).

Submitted

06/18/2026

Posted

06/19/2026

How to Cite

Knowledge production with generative AI: ethical and authorship issues. (2026). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.16603

Section

Educação em Revista

Plaudit

Data statement

  • The research data is contained in the manuscript