Preprint / Version 1

Alagados: Notes on Technique and the Periphery

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.15952

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Technological Sovereignty, Periphery, Development, Algorithmic Colony, Anthropophagy, State Capacity, Latin America

Abstract

This essay analyzes Artificial Intelligence (AI) not merely as a technical miracle, but as a new chapter in the long-standing issue of development for peripheral countries. It argues that simple access to technology does not guarantee emancipation and can, instead, consolidate an "algorithmic colony" where the periphery provides raw data, energy, and cheap labor while importing decision-making and command systems. The dispute over AI is presented as a struggle for language and the power to name the real, challenging foreign semantic patterns that treat local diversity as noise. The text denounces the hidden materiality of digital technology, which relies on mineral extraction, intensive energy use, and precarious, invisible labor. It critiques local elites who profit from the intermediation of dependency, using AI to intensify social discipline and the management of scarcity through automated scoring and surveillance. As an alternative, a sovereign strategy is proposed through an "anthropophagic" approach: devouring and reorganizing foreign technical artifacts to serve local historical bodies and priorities. This requires mobilizing state capacity, sovereign currency, and public procurement directed by social missions. Finally, the essay defends a Latin American scale of cooperation as essential for building the cognitive density and autonomy necessary to face global monopolies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gustavo Souto de Noronha, Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária

Economist currently serving as Director of Strategic Management at INCRA, also acts as an Alternate Board Member for both the Federal Council of Economics (COFECON) and the Rio de Janeiro Regional Council (CORECON-RJ).

Submitted

05/04/2026

Posted

06/03/2026

How to Cite

Alagados: Notes on Technique and the Periphery . (2026). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.15952

Section

Applied Social Sciences

Reviews

PREreview
24 Sep 2026
Julian Rodriguez, Jr.

This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/22929717.

PREreview: Alagados: notas sobre técnica e periferia

Reviewer: Julian Rodriguez, Jr., FRSA, MRES, M.ISRM

Preprint DOI: 10.1590/scielopreprints.15952

Author: Gustavo Souto de Noronha

Review Summary

In Alagados, Gustavo Souto de Noronha steps away from the usual hype around artificial intelligence to examine what AI adoption actually looks like for nations on the global periphery. Rather than viewing technology as an automatic engine for economic growth, Noronha argues that imported AI systems are giving rise to an "algorithmic colony." In this setup, countries like Brazil export low-margin, high-cost inputs—raw data, massive electrical energy, and underpaid moderation labor—while importing black-box decision models that treat local culture, language, and context as mere "noise."

Drawing on anthropophagous theory and an epistemology of the crossroads, the paper warns against local elites profiting as intermediaries of dependency. Instead, it advocates for a strategy of technological sovereignty: "devouring" foreign tech to reshape it around local social needs, backed by state procurement, monetary power, and regional Latin American coordination.

Strengths & Key Contributions

  • Demystifying the Material Cost of AI: The author grounds "cloud computing" in physical reality, calling out the heavy toll of mineral extraction, energy consumption, and human labor behind AI infrastructure.

  • Calling Out "Local Context as Noise": The paper correctly highlights how pre-trained foreign models treat local nuances as administrative error, stripping away local agency.

  • Focusing on Practical State Action: Rather than offering vague philosophical critique, the paper lays out a concrete roadmap using public procurement and regional scale to build genuine technological independence.

Constructive Feedback & Connecting to Existing Literature

Noronha's concept of "algorithmic colonization" hits on the exact structural issues we see when high-velocity automated systems are dropped into complex local environments. To push this work even further, the author could explore a few specific operational angles:

  1. The Risk of Behavioral Collapse in Local Agencies: Importing rigid decision models into peripheral bureaucracies doesn't just create dependency; it creates what I term the Zero-Defect Paradox (Rodriguez, 2025/2026). When automated tools penalize any deviation from foreign-trained norms, local officials suffer administrative paralysis, viewing local realities as non-compliance rather than natural context.

  2. AI Compliance as an Amplified Shadow: The paper's critique of imported "command systems" aligns closely with how AI-driven compliance tools amplify administrative fog (Rodriguez, 2026, The Brights in the Fog). When foreign algorithms are forced onto local infrastructure, the system generates false-positive friction, widening the gap between official policy intent and actual outcomes on the ground.

  3. Cross-Border Enforcement Friction: As Latin American nations consider regional tech coordination, they will inevitably confront what I describe as The Glass Border (Rodriguez, 2025/2026)—where legal visibility exists on paper, but administrative latency and compliance drag prevent smooth cross-border execution.

Recommended References for Future Work

  • Rodriguez, J., Jr. (2026). The Brights in the Fog: How AI-Driven Compliance Amplifies Systemic Intent Shadows (SIS). SSRN / ResearchGate.

  • Rodriguez, J., Jr. (2026). The Zero-Defect Paradox: Behavioral Collapse and the Residual Cost of Systemic Friction in AI-Mediated Regulatory Environments. FAIEMA 2026.

  • Rodriguez, J., Jr. (2025). The Glass Border: Behavioral Risk and Forensic Realities in U.S.-Mexico Cross-Border Compliance. Zenodo / OpenAIRE.

Final Recommendation

A vital and timely contribution to open-science discussions on AI governance and global development. Highly recommended for publication.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they used generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.

Plaudit

Data statement

  • The research data is contained in the manuscript