Preprint / Versão 1

Explorando o debate sobre os ecossistemas de inovação social: abordagens teóricas, epistemes e agenda de pesquisa futura

article.authors6aea34955aa0b

  • Juliane Pierri Ardigo Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-7313
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Graziela Dias Alperstedt Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-0406
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Supervision
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Carolina Andion Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4723-3437
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Luany Heinz Canazaro Dalla Vecchia Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1486-0142
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Methodology
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Lara Gondim Abreu Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0056-3900
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Methodology
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2026260079.en

Palavras-chave:

ecossistemas de inovação social, inovação social, revisão sistemática de literatura, análise teórica e epistemológica

Resumo

Objectives: This study analyzes the academic debate on Social Innovation Ecosystems (SIEs) by identifying primary theoretical approaches, epistemes, progress, and gaps to formulate propositions to put forward the field’s research agenda. Theoretical Approach: Beyond a bibliometric and descriptive thematic review, this article conducts a critical examination of the epistemological foundations in the debate. It proposes a research agenda anchored in Global South perspectives, specifically focusing on Latin America, to decolonize and expand theorization based on regional specificities. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines using the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The documentary corpus underwent bibliometric, theoretical, and epistemological analyses, which served as the foundation for the developed recommendations. Results: A bibliometric and longitudinal analysis of 267 articles (with high and moderate adherence to SIE) provided a macro overview of the field. Subsequently, an in-depth qualitative examination of the 19 high-adherence articles revealed the primary conceptualizations, frameworks, and methodologies employed, highlighting dominant analytical currents and their respective epistemological anchors. Conclusions: This study offers an original contribution by advancing the research agenda on SIE in both national and international contexts. By transcending thematic analysis, the article fosters new theorizations that consider diverse “ecologies of ecosystems” and geographic specificities, emphasizing the potential of research produced in the Global South and Latin America to advance the contemporary debate.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Enviado

03/11/2026

Postado

03/11/2026

Como Citar

Explorando o debate sobre os ecossistemas de inovação social: abordagens teóricas, epistemes e agenda de pesquisa futura. (2026). Em SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2026260079.en

Série

Ciências Sociais Aplicadas

Plaudit

Declaração de dados

  • Os dados de pesquisa não podem ser disponibilizados publicamente

    • Trata-se de revisão sistemática de literatura cujos dados de apoio consistem emmetadados bibliográficos exportados das bases proprietárias Scopus (Elsevier) e Web of Science(Clarivate), cujos termos de licença não permitem a redistribuição pública dos registros exportados.A reprodutibilidade do estudo é assegurada pelo protocolo detalhado no próprio manuscrito,conforme as diretrizes PRISMA (bases, strings de busca, filtros, etapas de triagem e critérios declassificação de aderência), que permite a reexecução integral da coleta; adicionalmente, os 19artigos que compõem o corpus da análise qualitativa encontram-se integralmente referenciadosno manuscrito