Preprint / Versión 1

Ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous)

article.authors6ad94b2bae27e

  • Guilherme Rech Cassanego Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-2465
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Natália Karianne Brandenburg Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-2663
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Gabriella de Nardin Peixoto Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8340-4438
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Data Curation
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Luiza Tonietto Mangini Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-8733
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Jean Carlos Gasparotto Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-2726
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Validation
    • Supervision
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Carolina Cauduro da Rosa Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-1378
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Cláudia Valéria Seullner Brandão Universidad Estatal Paulista image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-5214
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Software
    • Resources
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Sheila Canevese Rahal Universidad Estatal Paulista image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-4093
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Validation
    • Supervision
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Anita Marchionatti Pigatto Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-7984
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Luís Felipe Dutra Corrêa Universidad Federal de Santa María image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-1719
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20250611

Keywords:

canids, Cerdocyon thous, Lycalopex gymnocercus, veterinary ophthalmology

Resumen

Since ophthalmic data may differ between species, this study evaluated the ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in Lycalopex gymnocercus and Cerdocyon thous, and compare them with the values already described for wild and domestic canids. Twelve captive healthy wild canids were selected, including six L. gymnocercus (six females) and six C. thous (four males, two females), ages ranged from two to four years. The ophthalmic examination was performed under chemical restraint. Values of Schirmer tear test I (mm/min), intraocular pressure (mmHg) measured by rebound tonometry, and central corneal thickness (µm) determined with ultrasonic pachymetry were: 3.50 ± 0.84, 11.83 ± 2.06 and 548.83 ± 13.64 for L. gymnocercus, and 5.67 ± 3.08, 11.89 ± 3.17 and 531.83 ± 59.78 for C. thous. Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous chamber depth, and axial globe length measured (mm) by B-mode ultrasound were: 3.32 ± 0.19, 6.58 ± 0.23, 6.82 ± 0.43 and 17.20 ± 0.73 for L. gymnocercus, and 3.45 ± 0.23, 6.40 ± 0.19, 6.63 ± 0.29 and 16.53 ± 0.30 for C. thous. L. gymnocercus had a yellowish-green tapetal fundus, while C. thous had a predominance of bluish-green coloration. In conclusion, the ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters were similar in L. gymnocercus and C. thous, except for tapetal fundus color. The ecobiometric parameters compared to domestic dogs indicated that both wild canids presented a shallower anterior chamber, less lens thickness, and smaller ocular globe size.

Downloads

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Enviado

21/10/2026

Postado

21/10/2026

Cómo citar

Ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous). (2026). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20250611

Serie

Ciencias Agrícolas

Plaudit

Declaración de datos

  • Los datos de investigación están disponibles a petición, condición justificada en el manuscrito