Preprint / Version 1

Ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous)

##article.authors##

  • Guilherme Rech Cassanego Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-2465
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Natália Karianne Brandenburg Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-2663
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Gabriella de Nardin Peixoto Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8340-4438
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Data Curation
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Luiza Tonietto Mangini Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-8733
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Jean Carlos Gasparotto Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-2726
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Validation
    • Supervision
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Carolina Cauduro da Rosa Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-1378
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Cláudia Valéria Seullner Brandão São Paulo State University image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-5214
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Software
    • Resources
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Sheila Canevese Rahal São Paulo State University image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-4093
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Validation
    • Supervision
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Anita Marchionatti Pigatto Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-7984
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Luís Felipe Dutra Corrêa Federal University of Santa Maria image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-1719
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Software
    • Supervision
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20250611

Keywords:

canids, Cerdocyon thous, Lycalopex gymnocercus, veterinary ophthalmology

Abstract

Since ophthalmic data may differ between species, this study evaluated the ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in Lycalopex gymnocercus and Cerdocyon thous, and compare them with the values already described for wild and domestic canids. Twelve captive healthy wild canids were selected, including six L. gymnocercus (six females) and six C. thous (four males, two females), ages ranged from two to four years. The ophthalmic examination was performed under chemical restraint. Values of Schirmer tear test I (mm/min), intraocular pressure (mmHg) measured by rebound tonometry, and central corneal thickness (µm) determined with ultrasonic pachymetry were: 3.50 ± 0.84, 11.83 ± 2.06 and 548.83 ± 13.64 for L. gymnocercus, and 5.67 ± 3.08, 11.89 ± 3.17 and 531.83 ± 59.78 for C. thous. Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous chamber depth, and axial globe length measured (mm) by B-mode ultrasound were: 3.32 ± 0.19, 6.58 ± 0.23, 6.82 ± 0.43 and 17.20 ± 0.73 for L. gymnocercus, and 3.45 ± 0.23, 6.40 ± 0.19, 6.63 ± 0.29 and 16.53 ± 0.30 for C. thous. L. gymnocercus had a yellowish-green tapetal fundus, while C. thous had a predominance of bluish-green coloration. In conclusion, the ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters were similar in L. gymnocercus and C. thous, except for tapetal fundus color. The ecobiometric parameters compared to domestic dogs indicated that both wild canids presented a shallower anterior chamber, less lens thickness, and smaller ocular globe size.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submitted

10/21/2026

Posted

10/21/2026

How to Cite

Ophthalmological and ecobiometric parameters in pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous). (2026). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20250611

Section

Agricultural Sciences

Plaudit

Data statement

  • The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript