The Role of Serendipity in Educational Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.18159Keywords:
educational sciences, epistemology, research, complexity theory, serendipityAbstract
The complex nature of education, characterised by unpredictability, justifies the exploration of serendipity — the discovery of knowledge that was not intentionally sought — as a legitimate process of scientific production. This study aims to characterise the use of serendipity in the careers of experienced education researchers and to identify the factors that influence it. Methodologically, the research adopted a qualitative, interpretative approach, using Grounded Theory. Interviews were conducted with 19 researchers with over 15 years’ experience, and the data were analysed through open coding, categorisation and constant comparison until theoretical saturation was reached.
The results indicate that serendipity manifests itself in four dimensions: the undirected identification of knowledge, the active search for hidden factors, the unpredictable effects of the knowledge produced, and the discovery of new research techniques. The process is underpinned by the interaction between secondary professionalisation, anticipatory epistemic engagement, sage wisdom and epistemological professional development. In conclusion, the emerging theory suggests that serendipity is an integral part of educational research, in line with the complex ontology of education. This phenomenon helps to underpin the epistemological autonomy of the Educational Sciences and reinforces the importance of integrating serendipity as a skill to be intentionally developed in the training of researchers.
Downloads
Submitted
Posted
How to Cite
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Nuno Miranda e Silva, Sónia Pereira Dinis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
Plaudit
Data statement
-
The research data cannot be made publicly available
- The data relate to statements and narratives from experienced researchers in the field of education who are well-known figures within the community. Participants frequently referred to articles they had published, concepts or theories they had developed, and their places of work and scientific collaboration. Consequently, although every effort was made to remove any identifying details from the data, there is a strong possibility that participants may be recognised when the data is read. It was therefore decided to include only a few examples of the data within the body of the article, as illustrative examples of the emerging categories. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)


