Preprint / Version 1

The Role of Serendipity in Educational Research

##article.authors##

  • Nuno Miranda e Silva University of Évora image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-7679
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Project Administration
    • Resources
    • Funding Acquisition
    • Software
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Sónia Pereira Dinis University of Évora image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-0322
    • Conceptualization
    • Formal Analysis
    • Investigation
    • Methodology
    • Validation
    • Visualization
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.18159

Keywords:

educational sciences, epistemology, research, complexity theory, serendipity

Abstract

The complex nature of education, characterised by unpredictability, justifies the exploration of serendipity — the discovery of knowledge that was not intentionally sought — as a legitimate process of scientific production. This study aims to characterise the use of serendipity in the careers of experienced education researchers and to identify the factors that influence it. Methodologically, the research adopted a qualitative, interpretative approach, using Grounded Theory. Interviews were conducted with 19 researchers with over 15 years’ experience, and the data were analysed through open coding, categorisation and constant comparison until theoretical saturation was reached.

The results indicate that serendipity manifests itself in four dimensions: the undirected identification of knowledge, the active search for hidden factors, the unpredictable effects of the knowledge produced, and the discovery of new research techniques. The process is underpinned by the interaction between secondary professionalisation, anticipatory epistemic engagement, sage wisdom and epistemological professional development. In conclusion, the emerging theory suggests that serendipity is an integral part of educational research, in line with the complex ontology of education. This phenomenon helps to underpin the epistemological autonomy of the Educational Sciences and reinforces the importance of integrating serendipity as a skill to be intentionally developed in the training of researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nuno Miranda e Silva, University of Évora

Nuno Miranda e Silva é licenciado em Ciências do Desporto, pela Universidade de Lisboa; mestre em Gestão e Administração Educativa, pela Universidade Aberta; e doutorando em Ciência da Educação, na Universidade de Évora.

É membro do Centro de Investigação em Educação e Psicologia da Universidade de Évora, onde tem desenvolvido projetos de pesquisa na área das práticas letivas, Educação Física, Epistemologia das Ciências da Educação e liderança educativa.

É formador de técnicos superiores e de professores.

Sónia Pereira Dinis, University of Évora

Sónia Pereira Dinis é licenciada em Psicologia, mestre em Psicologia na área da Psicologia da Educação e doutora em Ciências da Educação, com formação na Universidade de Évora.

É investigadora em educação e psicologia, principalmente nas temáticas da gestão e liderança educativa, práticas letivas, desenvolvimento profissional dos professores e intervenção em contextos de crise e catástrofe.

Foi docente no ensino superior, nas áreas da psicologia, gestão de recursos humanos e educação. É formadora de técnicos superiores e de professores.

Submitted

09/26/2026

Posted

09/30/2026

How to Cite

The Role of Serendipity in Educational Research. (2026). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.18159

Section

Educação em Revista

Plaudit

Data statement

  • The research data cannot be made publicly available

    • The data relate to statements and narratives from experienced researchers in the field of education who are well-known figures within the community. Participants frequently referred to articles they had published, concepts or theories they had developed, and their places of work and scientific collaboration. Consequently, although every effort was made to remove any identifying details from the data, there is a strong possibility that participants may be recognised when the data is read. It was therefore decided to include only a few examples of the data within the body of the article, as illustrative examples of the emerging categories. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)