DOI of the published preprint https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v23.1692_PT
Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: cases series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.11419Keywords:
Psychological Stress, Wounds and Injuries, Wound Healing, Case Reports, Enterostomal Therapy, PsychologyAbstract
Objective: To exemplify the stress, distress, and coping assessment perceived by patients with hard-to-heal wounds (HHW) receiving treatment in a Stomatherapy outpatient clinic. Methods: Observational, prospective secondary study involved 10 adult patients with HHW, who were followed over two to six consultations. The following tools were used: sociodemographic and clinical data form; Brief Pain Inventory (sensitivity - BPI-S and interference - BPI-I); Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which included measures of coping and distress with data expressed as means. Results: Patients primarily had HHW located on the lower extremities, with a duration of 21.2 months; BWAT score was 23.7; BPI-S was 4; and BPI-I was 3.2. Stress was characterized by a total PSS score of 28.5 points, with a distress score of 16.4 and a coping score of 16. In the final consultation, there was a decrease of 4.3 points in BWAT; 0.8 points in BPI-S; and 7.6 points in PSS, with a 5.3 point reduction in distress. The BPI-I increased by 0.7, and coping improved by 2.2. Conclusion: The wound seems to interfere with the level of perceived stress, i.e. the patient's biopsychosocial dimension. Coping stands out as a determining factor in the perception of stress, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential for its management and assessment of distress.
Downloads
Posted
Versions
- 05/05/2025 (2)
- 03/14/2025 (1)
How to Cite
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Beatriz Costa Ferreira, Carol Viviana Serna González, Beatriz Yamada, Vera Lucia Conceição de Gouveia Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Grant numbers 001
Reviews
No Reviews Available
Plaudit
Version justification
Data statement
-
The research data cannot be made publicly available
- This manuscript is part of a primary study whose publication is in progress. As a result, the database is still confidential.


