This preprint has been published elsewhere.
DOI of the published preprint https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v23.1692_PT
Preprint / Version 2

Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: cases series

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.11419

Keywords:

Psychological Stress, Wounds and Injuries, Wound Healing, Case Reports, Enterostomal Therapy, Psychology

Abstract

Objective: To exemplify the stress, distress, and coping assessment perceived by patients with hard-to-heal wounds (HHW) receiving treatment in a Stomatherapy outpatient clinic. Methods: Observational, prospective secondary study involved 10 adult patients with HHW, who were followed over two to six consultations. The following tools were used: sociodemographic and clinical data form; Brief Pain Inventory (sensitivity - BPI-S and interference - BPI-I); Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which included measures of coping and distress with data expressed as means. Results: Patients primarily had HHW located on the lower extremities, with a duration of 21.2 months; BWAT score was 23.7; BPI-S was 4; and BPI-I was 3.2. Stress was characterized by a total PSS score of 28.5 points, with a distress score of 16.4 and a coping score of 16. In the final consultation, there was a decrease of 4.3 points in BWAT; 0.8 points in BPI-S; and 7.6 points in PSS, with a 5.3 point reduction in distress. The BPI-I increased by 0.7, and coping improved by 2.2. Conclusion: The wound seems to interfere with the level of perceived stress, i.e. the patient's biopsychosocial dimension. Coping stands out as a determining factor in the perception of stress, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential for its management and assessment of distress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Posted

03/14/2025 — Updated on 05/05/2025

Versions

How to Cite

Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: cases series. (2025). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.11419 (Original work published 2025)

Section

Health Sciences

Reviews

No Reviews Available

Plaudit

Version justification

A 2º versão foi adicionada devido à alterações realizadas após passar por revisores de uma revista.

Data statement

  • The research data cannot be made publicly available

    • This manuscript is part of a primary study whose publication is in progress. As a result, the database is still confidential.