BIBLIOMETRIC AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE WORK "CONEXÕES": DELEUZIANA PHILOSOPHY IN EVIDENCE: DELEUZIANA PHILOSOPHY IN EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4690Keywords:
Deleuze, Education, Bibliometry, Contextual analysis, Information ScienceAbstract
The objective of this research is to analyze the bibliographic references of the area of education using the Connections collection as corpus, seeking to identify the main contributions of Deleuze. This is a reflexive, exploratory and descriptive study of a bibliometric approach. The events that gave rise to the works Connections had Deleuze as thematic scope, which justifies that the authorship of most of the works cited is attributed to Deleuze. The proximity of other philosophers around Deleuze's philosophy, whether those who formulated important positions within the philosophy of difference, as is the case of Félix Guattari, are other contemporary thinkers of the duo such as Michel Foucault, Zourabchvilli or Rancière. We also highlight the position of the researcher Silvio Gallo, Brazilian leadership in the studies of Foucault and Deleuze in the home institution of the seminars Connections. Regarding the institutions of affiliation of the authors stand out the State University of Campinas and Federal University of Espírito Santo, as well as several international institutions, such as the University of Georgia, USA and University of St. Andrews, Scotland. The areas of knowledge of the authors of the chapters that stood out the most were Education followed by the area of Arts and Philosophy. Deleuze's most cited works were A Thousand Plateaus and What is philosophy?. The scholars of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari are moved through various areas of knowledge. The main philosophical concepts present in the books Connections that opportunistized show the effort of researchers in creating new words, often in the combination of whole or jagged words to reach innovative meanings.
Downloads
Metrics
Posted
How to Cite
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Solange Puntel Mostafa, Marcia Regina da Silva, Ednéia Silva Santos Rocha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.