Preprint / Version 1

The [VacontecimentoQUE] construction and the connection of unequal statements in Portuguese: the caveat as a discursive attitude

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7787

Keywords:

Connector, Contrast, Caveat, Focus

Abstract

This work addresses the contrastive connection of utterances in contemporary Portuguese, investigating the semantic specifications and the caveat value of constructions [VacontecimentoQUE]. These constructions are formed by event verbs (acontecer, ocorrer and suceder), inflected in the third person singular of the present indicative, followed by the particle que. It is proposed that such constructions are used by speakers to introduce a rupture in the discourse, redirecting the argument that is constructed through the addition of more salient information. After constructional changes, ongoing research considers that micro-constructions such as acontece que, ocorre que and sucede que start to function as connectors that establish relations of inequality between segments. In the light of usage-based linguistics and based on the constructional approach to grammar, the analysis addresses the specificities of [VacontecimentoQUE] when connecting sentences, involving syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects. The studies of Halliday (1985; 2004) and Neves (1984; 2011) regarding clause connections are used as theoretical basis. Contrastive notions, based on Lakoff (1971), Longhin (2003), Neves (2011), Castilho (2016), and Azeredo (2018) are also used in the analysis. Primarily qualitative in nature, this research has as its corpus statements by senators, already available transcribed on the Senate's institutional website. The partial results indicate that statements introduced by [VacontecimentoQUE] constructions mark a rupture in the discourse due to the addition of a new clause that changes the direction of the argumentation. This new argument, in turn, may be loaded with a caveat effect, a speaker's discursive atitude which is a result of the pragmatic focusing effect in combination with the violation of semantic expectancy. The semantic specifications identified for [VacontecimentoQUE] are: (i) simple contrast, (ii) partial contrast, which can restrict or detail the preceding segment, (iii) contrast by non-realization, (iv) inferential contrast by justification and (v) discursive-pragmatic contrast by focusing. Caveat is most salient in the partial contrast specification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nilza Barrozo Dias, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Graduou-se em Licenciatura em Letras (Português/Inglês) pela Faculdade de Filosofia Santa Dorotéia (1976) e cursou Especialização em Língua Portuguesa pela Universidade Federal Fluminense/UFF (1987). Obteve o título de Mestre em Letras pela Universidade Federal Fluminense de Niterói (1994) e o de Doutorado em Linguística pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas/UNICAMP, Área de Sociolinguística- Variação e Mudança Linguística (2001), sob a orientação da Profa. Dra. Maria Luiza Braga. Cursou um ano do doutorado na University of Santa Barbara, Califórnia, Estados Unidos, sob a orientação da Professora Doutora Sandra Thompson. Fez Pós-Doutorado na Universidade Católica Portuguesa, em Braga, Portugal, sob supervisão do Professor Doutor Augusto Soares, Semântica Cognitiva. Desenvolveu trabalho junto à Universidade de Goiás e Universidad del Salermo, sob a supervisão da Profª Vânia Casseb-Galvão. É, atualmente, Professora Adjunta da Universidade Federal Fluminense. Atua no ensino de Graduação e na Pós-Graduação em Estudos de Linguagem. Tem experiência na área de Linguística, atuando principalmente em: Funcionalismo; Linguística Centrada no Uso; Semântica Cognitiva e Sociolinguística Interacional versus gramática de base funcionalista. Possui inúmeros trabalhos publicados em sua área de interesse. 

Posted

05/14/2026 — Updated on 01/08/2024

How to Cite

The [VacontecimentoQUE] construction and the connection of unequal statements in Portuguese: the caveat as a discursive attitude. (2024). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7787

Section

Linguistic, literature and arts

Reviews

No Reviews Available

Plaudit