REVISÃO ABERTA POR PARES: QUANDO, POR QUE E PARA QUEM?

Joana Coeli Ribeiro Garcia; Fernanda Mirelle de Almeida Silva; Kleisson Lainnon Nascimento da Silva

doi:10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3646

##article.authors##

Joana Coeli Ribeiro Garcia Federal University of Paraíba
Fernanda Mirelle de Almeida Silva Federal University of Paraíba https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1814-3600
Kleisson Lainnon Nascimento da Silva Federal University of Paraíba https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-2372

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3646

Keywords:

Open peer review, Open review, Scientific Comunication, Open Science

Abstract

Open peer review, open review or OPR is an asset that benefits authors, evaluators, publishers and the scientific community who use its final product daily basis. This resource is consecrated based on the philosophy coming from the open science, reducing biases of the obscurantism of the conventional molds that perpass the contexto the production and scientific
communication. This research aims at contributing for adoption on the open peer review, minimizing ideological obstacles over the dynamics that permeate the process, as an answer to the questions that originate and conduct this communication. Aiming to attend the objective, it is searched in the literature and in the metrics of the scientific production recovered in the Web of Science (WoS), with emphasis on the authorship, approaches, date of publication and area of knowledge, used to synthesize and limit distinct aspects of the thematic. There are 130 articles, published from 1993-2020, from different areas of knowledge, in which Information Science and medicine with their specialities present most of the articles. After answers to the question that originated the study, provocations over the destinies that the thematic OPR will follow in the open science and the challenges confronting the subjects who work in the area are made.