Preprint / Version 1

Principal components to evaluate the minimum intervention in cariology in a Cuban curriculum

##article.authors##

  • Alain Manuel Chaple Gil Centro Internacional de Salud "La Pradera" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-4429
    • Estela de los Ángeles Gispert Abreu Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública (ENSAP). La Habana, Cuba.

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2589

      Keywords:

      factor analysis, main components, teaching, learning, dental caries, minimal intervention

      Abstract

      Introduction: The evaluations of the knowledge system conceived in university careers require practical tools to specify the search for weaknesses in the different processes.

      Objective: to determine the main components of an instrument to evaluate the cognitive-practical capacities necessary for the teaching-learning of the minimum intervention in the treatment of dental caries in the Stomatology program of studies.

      Methods: descriptive cross-sectional study. 52 teachers participated in the retest previously carried out in a reliability study. The data from the pilot study resulting from the validation process of the form were used to perform the parametric analyzes that will be described. From this, the values ​​of the evaluation carried out in the retest were extracted, adjusting it to an acceptable sample for this type of study. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett's sphericity test, analysis of communalities, analysis of variance and the regrouping of the items in the proposed dimensions was carried out with the Varimax rotation.

      Results: the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin exceeded the acceptable minimum (0.763) and the level of significance was p <0.000 according to the Bartlett test, so the factor analysis was appropriate. It was observed that all the variables were well explained by the model with figures between 85.8% and 97.7% of variability. The first 6 components have greater weight to explain the data, with respective figures of 29.6%, 24.0%, 14.0%, 10.9%, 8.4% and 6.7%, therefore they explain 93.6% of the variability.

      Conclusions: The main components were renamed according to the factors they grouped.

      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.

      Posted

      07/11/2021

      How to Cite

      Principal components to evaluate the minimum intervention in cariology in a Cuban curriculum. (2021). In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2589

      Section

      Health Sciences

      Plaudit