DOI of the published preprint https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000042025
Bionematicides in sugarcane planting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.14391Keywords:
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Meloidogyne, Pratylenchus, Pochonia chlamidosporiaAbstract
Biological nematicides have become the predominant treatment of sugarcane fields infested by nematodes, although there are few studies evaluating the effects of these products on this crop. In this context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of Bacillus subtilis + B. licheniformis (®Quartz) and Pochonia chlamydoporia (®Rizotec) on nematode control and on sugarcane yield, comparing with a chemical nematicide, when applied on furrow. Eight experiments were carried on in São Paulo State infested areas, in which four treatments [check - no nematicide; carbosulfan 700EC 4 L ha-1 - standard treatment; Bacillus subtilis + Bacillus licheniformis (®Quartzo) 0.16 kg ha-1 and P. chlamydoporia (®Rizotec) 1 kg ha-1)] were applied on furrow. Carbosulfan was the most efficient treatment in Pratylenchus spp. control, reducing populations at least until four months after planting and contributing to average increases of 11% in yield. P. chlamydosporia reduced populations of Pratylenchus spp. four months after planting and promoted a productivity increase of 6% in relation to the control. The treatment with B. subtilis + B. licheniformis was less effective in nematodes control than the other treatments, and the plots treated with this biological product produced 5 % more than check.
Downloads
Posted
How to Cite
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Leila Luci Dinardo-Miranda, Isabella Dinardo Miranda, Higor Domingos Silvério da Silva, Juliano Vilela Fracasso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Plaudit
Data statement
-
The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript


