Recalibrating the Scope of Scholarly Publishing: A Modest Step in a Vast Decolonization Process
Keywords:Scholarly communication, journal publishing, open access, Global South, OA diamond journals, decolonial process
By analyzing 25,671 journals largely absent from journal counts and indexes, this study demonstrates that scholarly communication is more of a global endeavor than is commonly credited. These journals, employing the open source publishing platform Open Journal Systems (OJS), have published 5.8 million items and represent 136 countries, with 79.9 percent publishing in the Global South and 84.2 percent following the OA diamond model (charging neither reader nor author). More than half (54.6 percent) of the journals operate in more than one language, while publishing research in 60 languages (led by English, Indonesian, Spanish, and Portuguese). The journals are distributed across the social sciences (45.9 percent), STEM (40.3 percent), and the humanities (13.8 percent). For all their geographic, linguistic, and disciplinary diversity, the Web of Science indexes 1.2 percent of the journals and Scopus 5.7 percent. On the other hand, Cabells Predatory Reports includes 1.0 percent of the journals, while Beall lists 1.4 percent of them as predatory. A recognition of the expanded scope and scale of scholarly publishing will help ensure that humankind takes full advantage of what is increasingly a global research enterprise.
- 10/03/2022 (2)
- 09/12/2022 (1)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Saurabh Khanna , Jon Ball, Juan Pablo Alperin, John Willinsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.