Preprint / Version 1

The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244

Keywords:

COVID-19, Brazil, India, Public Health, Necropolitics

Abstract

We draw on Cameroonian philosopher Achille Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics to examine government responses to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India, two middle-income nations not commonly compared. The article describes the role played by President Jair Bolsonaro and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in aggravating the pandemic. Bolsonaro scorned medical advice and framed COVID-19 as a “little flu.” Conversely, Modi formally embraced social distancing and a nationwide lockdown. Despite differences between Brazilian and Indian approaches to COVID-19, in both countries discriminated people tended to remained invisible. This article argues that India’s and Brazil’s divergent responses to the COVID-19 emergency was a matter of degree and not of kind in regulating a necropolitical policy that considered some citizens as expendable: blacks and Indigenous people from the Amazon, in the case of Brazil; and in the case of India the sizable Muslim minority, marginalized Hindu castes and migrant workers. Whereas deaths due to COVID-19 attracted voluminous international media attention, the deaths of disenfranchised people in Brazil and India received insufficient attention and the perception of their condition has assimilated into the common trope that developing countries are unable to protect themselves as they should.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Posted

06/08/2022

How to Cite

Cueto, M., Neelakantan, V. ., & Lopes, G. (2022). The Regulation of Necropolitics: Governmental Responses to COVID-19 in Brazil and India in the first year of the pandemic. In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4244

Section

Human Sciences

Plaudit

1 Rapid PREreviews
0 Full PREreviews
2 Requests

Rapid PREreviews

Are the findings novel?

100%

Are the results likely to lead to future research?

100%

Is sufficient detail provided to allow reproduction of the study?

100%

Are the methods and statistics appropriate for the analysis?

100%

Are the principal conclusions supported by the data and analysis?

100%

Does the manuscript discuss limitations?

100%

Have the authors adequately discussed ethical concerns?

100%

Does the manuscript include new data?

100%

Are the data used in the manuscript available?

100%

Is the code used in the manuscript available?

100%

Would you recommend this manuscript to others?

100%

Do you recommend this manuscript for peer review?

100%

View on the PREreview website