Preprint / Version 1

Cheating interactions favor modularity in mutualistic networks

##article.authors##

  • Lucas Arantes Camacho Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-1488
  • Cecilia Siliansky de Andreazzi (a) Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, 21045-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, (b) present address: Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-0635
  • Lucas P Medeiros Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, 02139 Cambridge, MA, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0320-5058
  • Irina B Barros School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, EUA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-7044
  • Carine Emer National Center for Research and Conservation of Wild Birds (CEMAVE). BR 230 - KM 10. Restinga de Cabedelo National Forest, Renascer. Cabedelo - PB Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1258-2816
  • Carolina Reigada Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCAR - São Carlos, SP - Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-219X
  • Paulo R Guimarães Jr Department of Ecology - Institute of Biosciences, USP, Rua do Matão, Tv. 14 - Butantã, São Paulo - SP, 05508-090, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9161-8305

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3289

Keywords:

Cheaters, Coevolution, Modularity, Mutualisms, Network Theory

Abstract

A fundamental fact about mutualisms is they are often explored by species that explore resources and services provided by individuals without providing any benefit. The role of these cheaters on the evolutionary dynamics of mutualisms has long been recognized, but cheaters may not only affect the species they explore. Because mutualisms form networks that often involve dozens to hundreds of species in a given site, indirect effects generated by cheaters may cascade through the network, reshaping trait evolution. Here, we study how harboring cheating interactions can influence coevolution in mutualistic networks. We combine a coevolutionary model, data on empirical networks of mutualisms, and numerical simulations to show that the higher frequency of cheating interactions can lead to the formation of groups of species phenotypically similar to each other but distinct from other groups of species, leading to higher trait disparity. The clustered trait patterns generated by cheaters, in turn, change the patterns of interaction in simulated networks, fostering the formation of modules of interacting species. Our results indicate that cheaters of mutualisms can contribute to generate phenotypic clusters in mutualisms, counteracting selection for convergence imposed by mutualistic patterns, and favoring the emergence of modules of interacting species.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Posted

12/02/2021

Section

Biological Sciences